Reflection on Observation Lesson
What
went well?
The
children learnt the benefits of magnifying glasses to observe objects closely.
For
their age they produced detailed drawings of their shells observing the
different patterns, textures, sections, colours noticed and contours. Children
referred back to the object frequently by looking through the magnifying glass
to check their drawing against their object.
Children
then progressed onto making models of their shells out of Plasticine they
again focused on getting the correct shape and contours of their shell and
began to draw in patterns using their pencils to carve in to create
textures.
Why
did it go well?
Gave
them lots of prompts throughout the activity to keep children motivated and
using the magnifying glasses got them engaged in the activity more as excited
by this new piece of equipment.
What
did not go as planned or work well?
Lack
of explanation as felt pushed for time when in fact if we had spent more time
properly explaining and modelling to the children they would have a much
clearer idea of the task ahead of them. More organisation needed beforehand
i.e. more time needed to set up and prepare before children came in.
More
scientific terminology was needed rather than a greater focus seeming to be
placed on the creativity of the subject matter. Then due to us being art
specialists it became more art based for us.
Are
you clear about what you mean by the word ‘well’?
Meeting
some of our learning objectives and achieving something within the lesson as
progress in the children’s understanding as to what observation is deepened.
What
would you change for next time?
Not
rush the explanation as much and put a greater emphasis on filling the page via
more clarity. Also have a greater subject knowledge so that we could have
brought it round to a scientific way of thinking.
What
two ways worked best in getting children to observe in more detail?
Use
of the magnifying glasses and looking through them in different ways and
getting children to describe what they were observing and using prompt
questions when necessary to widen the thinking/discussion.
Can
you think of two ways to alter the other methods to make them better?
Greater
time period to complete the session in would have allowed for less pressure to
be put on both us, hence the children also probably felt rushed and had very
little time left to complete the second activity of making their own model from Plasticine which would have reinforced the first activity. The lack of plenary
to assess the learning that occurred through questioning and discussion.
Comments
Post a Comment